Blog Listing
- @Number71
- Beauty In Ruins
- Best Fantasy Books HQ
- Bitten By Books
- Booknest
- Bookworm Blues
- Charlotte's Library
- Civilian Reader
- Critical Mass
- Curated Fantasy Books
- Dark Wolf's Fantasy Reviews
- Everything is Nice
- Falcata Times
- Fantasy & SciFi Lovin' News & Reviews
- Fantasy Cafe
- Fantasy Literature
- Gold Not Glittering
- GoodKindles
- Grimdark Magazine
- Hellnotes
- io9
- Jabberwock
- Jeff VanderMeer
- King of the Nerds
- Layers of Thought
- Lynn's Book Blog
- Neth Space
- Novel Notions
- Omnivoracious
- Only The Best Science Fiction & Fantasy
- Pat's Fantasy Hotlist
- Pyr-O-Mania
- Realms Of My Mind
- Rob's Blog O' Stuff
- Rockstarlit Bookasylum
- SciFiChick.com
- Smorgasbord Fantasia
- Speculative Book Review
- Stainless Steel Droppings
- Tez Says
- The Antick Musings of G.B.H. Hornswoggler, Gent.
- The B&N Sci-Fi & Fantasy Blog
- The Bibliosanctum
- The Book Smugglers
- The Fantasy Hive
- The Fantasy Inn
- The Nocturnal Library
- The OF Blog
- The Qwillery
- The Speculative Scotsman
- The Vinciolo Journal
- The Wertzone
- Thoughts Stained With Ink
- Tip the Wink
- Tor.com
- Val's Random Comments
- Voyager Books
- Walker of Worlds
- Whatever
- Whispers & Wonder
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(375)
-
▼
October
(40)
- SPOTLIGHT: Graphic Novels of November 2008
- Winners of the Jim Butcher, Anathem T-Shirt and Mi...
- "The Devil's Eye" by Jack McDevitt (Reviewed by Li...
- Winners of the Gregory Maguire | Let the Right One...
- GIVEAWAY: Solaris Books ‘Extreme’ Photo Contest!!!
- "The Memorist" by M.J. Rose (Reviewed by Liviu C. ...
- Song of the Week: "Death" by White Lies
- "The Way of Shadows" by Brent Weeks (Reviewed by L...
- Winners of the David Wellington Giveaway! + Misc. ...
- “The Second Siege” by Henry H. Neff (Reviewed by C...
- OVERLOOKED TITLES: "The Good Thief", "The Hunger G...
- “The Ghost in Love” by Jonathan Carroll (Reviewed ...
- Song of the Week: "Smash Lies" by Matisyahu
- Free Andy Remic Podcasts! + A Special Neal Stephen...
- “The Book of Lies” by Brad Meltzer (Reviewed by Fá...
- "Winterstrike" by Liz Williams (Reviewed by Liviu ...
- "The January Dancer" by Michael Flynn (Reviewed by...
- Winners of the Brandon Sanderson & Matthew Stover ...
- A Conversation with Leslie S. Klinger About “The N...
- Dabel Brothers to Publish an Original Comic Book S...
- “The Dresden Files: Welcome to the Jungle” by Jim ...
- Song of the Week: "Violent and Young" by Iglu & Ha...
- "Caine Black Knife" by Matthew Stover (Reviewed by...
- Upcoming Releases: “The Union Trilogy” Omnibus by ...
- Upcoming Releases: “The Book of Nonsense” by David...
- Win a Time Machine from Solaris Books + a Neil Gai...
- "Blade of Tyshalle" by Matthew Stover (Reviewed by...
- PRESS RELEASE: John Jarrold Literary Agency conclu...
- “The Turtle Moves! Discworld’s Story Unauthorized”...
- Neil Gaiman's "The Graveyard Book" Virtual Tour!
- "Heroes Die" by Matthew Stover (Reviewed by Liviu ...
- Comix Galaxy at Miami Book Fair International
- Song(s) of the Week: The Killers, Nickelback & Sno...
- UPCOMING RELEASES: “End of the Century” by Chris R...
- Winners of the Peter F. Hamilton Giveaway!!!
- SPOTLIGHT: Graphic Novels of October 2008
- PRESS RELEASE: Dabel Brothers declares October Dre...
- PRESS RELEASE — Look Who’s Talking Up Pyr!
- PRESS RELEASE — UK Author Toby Frost joins John Ja...
- SPOTLIGHT: Books of October 2008
-
▼
October
(40)
The first time I heard of Jonathan Carroll was almost twenty years ago, when a friend of mine let me borrow “Outside the Dog Museum”. At that time I was strictly a SF buff, with no time for that “nonsense Fantasy stuff”, as I used to say then.
Little did I know then.
“Outside the Dog Museum” was a real eye-opener to me. It was then that I discovered that a Fantasy book didn’t need to be all about Tolkien-like fantasy, or even epic, heroic fantasy. (Even though, in all those years since, I learned to enjoy these other kinds of Fantasy as well, but that’s another story.)
I liked that book so much that my friend let me borrow another one—“After Silence”. This time I was deeply moved, so moved that tears would fall without control from my eyes for at least half the book (you can imagine how I felt at the tragic story ending, then).
As Neil Gaiman very aptly puts it in an introductory text to Carroll’s website:
Jonathan Carroll's a changer. He's one of the special ones, one of the few. He paints the world he sees. He opens a window you did not know was there and invites you to look through it. He gives you his eyes to see with, and he gives you the world all fresh and honest and new.
Despite this very true fact (or maybe because of it—a Freudian slip may be lurking in the shadows as I write this review), I never read Carroll again. Until “The Ghost in Love.”
We’ve all seen this plot before—the person who dies before his/her time and then is forced to come back to Earth. This slight variation is not unheard of as well—the person who doesn’t die but should have died—and then all Heaven breaks loose for it. The ghost who is called to tie the loose ends of Ben Gould’s life discovers, appalled, that he is very much alive, even if he had fallen down in the street and was supposed to have died after hitting his head on the curb.
Carroll presents us with a different kind of ghost—a kind that is an autonomous entity and, at the same time, a piece of the soul of the deceased. The ghost (an invention of an ancient Chinese author which God, in a fit of retcon-ness, decided to incorporate to his creations ex post facto) is charged of the logistical, bureaucratic part of the afterlife—to make amends for the recently deceased person and tie up loose ends.
This ghost, called Ling (because all the ghosts are given Chinese names, in homage to the original creator of the concept), simply begins to be a part of the routine of Gould’s life, and, maybe because it is part of Gould after all, falls in love with his girlfriend, German Landis. And suffers terribly when they break up.
But the story is not limited to this plot (things are never so simple in Carroll’s stories): Ben Gould’s “exaggerated death” affected deeply the great scheme of things—as Ling learns from her superior, the Angel of Death, Gould’s case is not the only one, and that means humankind is at last really discovering free will—humans are gaining the right to choose when to die and how, instead of putting themselves in the hands of fate. It’s an extreme landmark for the universe—but it isn’t necessarily good for everyone, because there are forces that are very much against this change, and will do everything in their power to make things come back to “normality”.
And that’s where Ling must make herself known to Gould, and also to Landis, because she must warn and protect them from this threat—and she definitely would, if it wasn’t for the fact that she unknowingly is turning herself into a common human being, and, therefore, is powerless to help them. But are they powerless?
With “The Ghost in Love”, Carroll recaptured my attention, and made me think that he is really one of a kind: he’s the only writer I know who can give this kind of story a really different spin—the plot becomes at the same time both less and more. Less in the sense that he sort of de-epicisizes the story, giving it a quotidian, everyday quality that makes it all the more believable. (One could almost think of the American Splendor comics, but without the mordacity.) More in the sense that he gives us readers the feeling that real magic can happen all the time around us even if we’re not aware of it. And we end the book changed, as in an alchemical process. That’s it: Carroll is a true alchemist of the spirit.
Little did I know then.
“Outside the Dog Museum” was a real eye-opener to me. It was then that I discovered that a Fantasy book didn’t need to be all about Tolkien-like fantasy, or even epic, heroic fantasy. (Even though, in all those years since, I learned to enjoy these other kinds of Fantasy as well, but that’s another story.)
I liked that book so much that my friend let me borrow another one—“After Silence”. This time I was deeply moved, so moved that tears would fall without control from my eyes for at least half the book (you can imagine how I felt at the tragic story ending, then).
As Neil Gaiman very aptly puts it in an introductory text to Carroll’s website:
Jonathan Carroll's a changer. He's one of the special ones, one of the few. He paints the world he sees. He opens a window you did not know was there and invites you to look through it. He gives you his eyes to see with, and he gives you the world all fresh and honest and new.
Despite this very true fact (or maybe because of it—a Freudian slip may be lurking in the shadows as I write this review), I never read Carroll again. Until “The Ghost in Love.”
We’ve all seen this plot before—the person who dies before his/her time and then is forced to come back to Earth. This slight variation is not unheard of as well—the person who doesn’t die but should have died—and then all Heaven breaks loose for it. The ghost who is called to tie the loose ends of Ben Gould’s life discovers, appalled, that he is very much alive, even if he had fallen down in the street and was supposed to have died after hitting his head on the curb.
Carroll presents us with a different kind of ghost—a kind that is an autonomous entity and, at the same time, a piece of the soul of the deceased. The ghost (an invention of an ancient Chinese author which God, in a fit of retcon-ness, decided to incorporate to his creations ex post facto) is charged of the logistical, bureaucratic part of the afterlife—to make amends for the recently deceased person and tie up loose ends.
This ghost, called Ling (because all the ghosts are given Chinese names, in homage to the original creator of the concept), simply begins to be a part of the routine of Gould’s life, and, maybe because it is part of Gould after all, falls in love with his girlfriend, German Landis. And suffers terribly when they break up.
But the story is not limited to this plot (things are never so simple in Carroll’s stories): Ben Gould’s “exaggerated death” affected deeply the great scheme of things—as Ling learns from her superior, the Angel of Death, Gould’s case is not the only one, and that means humankind is at last really discovering free will—humans are gaining the right to choose when to die and how, instead of putting themselves in the hands of fate. It’s an extreme landmark for the universe—but it isn’t necessarily good for everyone, because there are forces that are very much against this change, and will do everything in their power to make things come back to “normality”.
And that’s where Ling must make herself known to Gould, and also to Landis, because she must warn and protect them from this threat—and she definitely would, if it wasn’t for the fact that she unknowingly is turning herself into a common human being, and, therefore, is powerless to help them. But are they powerless?
With “The Ghost in Love”, Carroll recaptured my attention, and made me think that he is really one of a kind: he’s the only writer I know who can give this kind of story a really different spin—the plot becomes at the same time both less and more. Less in the sense that he sort of de-epicisizes the story, giving it a quotidian, everyday quality that makes it all the more believable. (One could almost think of the American Splendor comics, but without the mordacity.) More in the sense that he gives us readers the feeling that real magic can happen all the time around us even if we’re not aware of it. And we end the book changed, as in an alchemical process. That’s it: Carroll is a true alchemist of the spirit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
nice blog
Thanks!!!
You review makes me want to rush out and get this right away. Well done!
maybe its a good story and a scary one. hehe
Great review. I'll definitely link to it - you've said everything I'd like to say, only a million times better. I'm a huge fan of Carroll's work. :)
Many thanks for the good and thoughtful review. It nails what I was trying to say in the novel.
Jonathan Carroll