AUTHOR INFORMATION: David Chandler is a pseudonym for David Wellington, critically acclaimed author of such popular horror novels as the Monster trilogy, the Vampire series and the Werewolf Tales. He was also one of the writers of the New York Times bestseller Marvel Zombies Return. Den of Thieves is his first fantasy novel.
PLOT SUMMARY: Born and raised in the squalid depths of the Free City of Ness, Malden became a thief by necessity. Now he must pay a fortune to join the criminal operation of Cutbill, lord of the underworld—and one does not refuse the master . . . and live.
The coronet of the Burgrave would fulfill Malden’s obligations, though it is guarded by hungry demons that would tear the soul from any interloper. But the desperate endeavor leads to a more terrible destiny, as Malden, an outlaw knight, and an ensorcelled lady must face the most terrifying evil in the land...
FORMAT/INFO: Den of Thieves is 480 pages long divided over a Prologue, four titled Parts, and one hundred chapters. Also includes a map of the Free City of Ness and an excerpt from A Thief in the Night, book two of The Ancient Blades Trilogy. Narration is in the third person, mostly via the thief Malden and the knight Sir Croy, while minor POVs include Cythera. Den of Thieves is self-contained, but is the first volume in The Ancient Blades Trilogy, which will be followed by A Thief in the Night in September 2011 and Honor Among Thieves in November 2011.
July 26, 2011 marks the North American Mass Market Paperback publication of Den of Thieves via Harper Voyager. The UK edition (see below) was published on July 7, 2011 via Harper Voyager UK.
Of course, unfulfilled expectations is not the only reason David Chandler’s debut let me down. For starters, Malden is not very compelling as a protagonist, especially when compared to the likes of Locke Lamora from Scott Lynch’s Gentleman Bastard Sequence, Mildmay the Fox from Sarah Monette’s The Doctrine of Labyrinths, and Drothe from Douglas Hulick’s Among Thieves. All similar heroes/anti-heroes. The problem with Malden, besides a dry narrative voice that is devoid of personality, is the author’s failure to capture the charm and cleverness that Malden supposedly possesses. Plus, for someone who believes there is no honor among thieves, Malden is curiously honorable for a thief.
Sir Croy, the novel’s other main protagonist, is much more likable than Malden for the first three-fifths of the book, but then the knight’s naiveté takes center stage, transforming his admirable qualities—honor, chivalry, loyalty, duty—into annoyances. Then there’s Cythera. Cythera, the daughter of a witch, is an important figure in Den of Thieves because of her curse, her connection to the sorcerer Alebron Hazoth, and the fact that Malden & Sir Croy are both in love with her. As a character however, it’s hard to sympathize with Cythera. Much the way it’s hard to sympathize or care about Malden & Sir Croy. In fact, minor characters like Cutbill, the master of thieves; the card sharp Kemper, whose curse gives him a unique ability; and Murdlin, envoy of the Dwarf Kingdom, were much more interesting in my opinion, and I wish they had been featured more prominently in the novel. Especially Murdlin with his amusing manner of speech: “This way, most hurriedly, like a rabbit making love.” / “Stop standing there manipulating yourself in an erotic fashion.” / “Into the hay that itches like pubic lice.”
Secondly, Den of Thieves is oddly tame considering how much experience David Wellington possesses as a horror fiction author. Sure, there’s the Lovecraftian-inspired guardian of the Burgrave’s crown, Hazoth’s demon child, and various other atrocities, not to mention the violence and rare profanity, but overall, I was disappointed by how PG-13 the novel turned out to be. Particularly when the book is mentioned in the same breath as George R. R. Martin, Joe Abercrombie, and Scott Lynch, whose novels are known for their realism and grittiness. If only that was the case with David Chandler’s debut. Instead, Den of Thieves is much more fantastical and over-the-top, having more in common—based on what I’ve heard—with its other comparisons in R.A. Salvatore and Raymond E. Feist. Not a bad thing if you’re a fan of those authors, but not what I was expecting.
Third, the writing in Den of Thieves is disappointingly uneven. The story’s pacing may be engaging, the prose polished, and the action scenes entertaining and well-written, but I expected more from someone with ten novels under his belt. Because Den of Thieves is David Wellington’s first foray into fantasy, I can forgive the lackluster world-building, which primarily focuses on the Free City of Ness, its charter with the King of Skrae, Ancient Blades, and the Bloodgod Sadu, while including such familiar tropes as dwarves, elves and ogres. I can also overlook the lack of imagination found in the book’s magic system, which features curses, summoning demons, magic swords, paying a price to use sorcery, etc. What I cannot forgive or overlook, is the novel’s aforementioned shallow characterization and a story that suffers from predictability, weak plotting, and flimsy rationalizations. Like the whole reason the Burgrave’s crown was stolen in the first place!? Or Hazoth’s motives—If the sorcerer is so powerful, why would he even worry about the King of Skrae? Or anyone else for that matter?
Not only that, but was it really necessary for the author to spell out the novel’s various twists, especially considering how easy it was to figure things out beforehand? Also, is there any reason I should continue reading The Ancient Blades Trilogy? The first book ties things up so neatly, I have no motivation to pick up the sequel. I mean, what’s the overarching story arc? The conflict? The end goal? Worst of all, Den of Thieves could have been so much better. What if the book was darker & grittier? What if the main characters were charming and sympathetic? What if the story was cunningly plotted and full of unexpected twists & surprises? What if...
Despite my obvious disappointment with the book, Den of Thieves is not nearly as bad as I’m making it sound. David Chandler’s debut may not offer fully developed characters, indepth world-building, creative ideas, or clever plotting, but thanks to swift pacing and non-stop sword & sorcery action, Den of Thieves does provide lots of fun & thrills. Keeping expectations lowered though is the key to enjoying David Chandler’s debut. Because of the thief protagonist, the plot involving the Burgrave’s crown, and various other factors, I can see why Den of Thieves has drawn comparisons to George R.R. Martin, Joe Abercrombie, and Scott Lynch. Unfortunately, neither the book nor the author is anywhere close to that level. In fact, Den of Thieves is not even on the same level as Douglas Hulick’s Among Thieves, a similar, yet far superior fantasy debut that was released this same year. However, as long as readers understand what kind of book they’re getting with David Chandler’s debut, then Den of Thieves has plenty to offer...
12:01 AM | 
Posted by
Robert |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
.jpg)
7 comments:
Thanks for the great review. Although I am a bit disappointed. I was looking forward to this novel.
You're welcome Cameron :) If it's a book you were interested in, I would still give it a try. You never know; you might enjoy it more than I did...
It's more in the Fritz Leiber tradition of sword-and-sorery than the "new epic" vein (Abercrombie, GRRM, Lynch etc). Chandler dedicates the book to Leiber, Moorcock and Howard, so it's easy to see this as a homage and modern update of that particular genre, and I think he did a great job. The publisher probably markets this in the wrong direction, although I can understand that calling this the next Abercrombie is perhaps more attractive than "in the tradition of Fritz Leiber"...
Thanks for the comment Gray Tan. Sadly, I have never read anything by Fritz Leiber, although I've heard a lot about Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, which sounds like something I would enjoy. I saw a little of Robert E. Howard in the book, but saw a lot more in Prince of Thorns. Didn't really see too much of Moorcock though...
It's true the marketing was misleading, a common enough problem these days, but that doesn't explain the unsympathetic characters or weak plotting...
I really liked this book! One of my favourites this year. I liked Price of Thorns also, but this is a different beast. Chandler said that he was influenced by Pratchett also, and it shows (in a good way). Anyway, it is good to have different opinions, but it would be sad if people do not read this based on blog reviews. Reading this put a smile on my face all the time. For example, by the end of the book I was trying to read very slow because I wanted it to last longer. And I think Abercrombie is the best thing that happened to Fantasy world since a long time. So, anyone who likes lighter Sword&Sorcery - please try it, it's great!
I'm glad you liked the book Banotti :) I did mention in my review that the novel is very entertaining and has a lot to offer if you go in with the right mindset. That said, I still believe it could have been much better.
Have you read Among Thieves by Douglas Hulick? Den of Thieves is fairly similar to Among Thieves in tone & style, but the writing/execution in Douglas Hulick's novel is far superior, which is a major reason why I enjoyed Among Thieves so much more.
That's probably my biggest beef with Den of Thieves. I didn’t care about the characters, the story was too predictable, and the author tries so hard to be clever, but never pulls it off...
For lighter sword & sorcery action, I would highly recommend The Conquerors’ Shadow and The Goblin Corps by Ari Marmell, although the latter is pretty graphic and violent ;) Both are well-written, refreshingly subvert classic fantasy tropes, and are extremely entertaining!
I thoroughly enjoyed the book. In fact I bought the next two based on how much I enjoyed it.
If you like fantasy, give it a try.